From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Vannoy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Nov 19, 2020
CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-0858-P (W.D. La. Nov. 19, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-0858-P

11-19-2020

WILLIE BELL JR., Petitioner v. DARREL VANNOY, Respondent


MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein (ECF No. 8), and after a de novo review of the record, including the Objection (ECF No. 9) filed by Petitioner, having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers, this 19th day of November, 2020.

/s/_________

DAVID C. JOSEPH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bell v. Vannoy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Nov 19, 2020
CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-0858-P (W.D. La. Nov. 19, 2020)
Case details for

Bell v. Vannoy

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE BELL JR., Petitioner v. DARREL VANNOY, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Nov 19, 2020

Citations

CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:20-CV-0858-P (W.D. La. Nov. 19, 2020)