Bell v. United States

Full title: ROBERT LYNN BELL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jul 12, 2016

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-1624-G (BF) (N.D. Tex. Jul. 12, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-1624-G (BF) CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 3:93-CR-302-T

07-12-2016

ROBERT LYNN BELL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

A. JOE FISH Senior United States District Judge

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. Petitioner filed objections, and the district court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which objection was made. The objections are overruled, and the court ACCEPTS the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

It is therefore ORDERED that the successive habeas petition is TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 1631.^*

* An order transferring a successive application to the court of appeals is not a final order requiring a certificate of appealability. See United States v. Fulton, 780 F.3d 683, 688 (5th Cir. 2015). --------

SO ORDERED. July 12, 2016.

/s/ _________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge