From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Takeda Pharm. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Apr 4, 2017
MISC. CASE NO. 17-mc-70 (W.D. La. Apr. 4, 2017)

Opinion

MISC. CASE NO. 17-mc-70

04-04-2017

CHARLOTTE BELL v. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED, ET AL


MAGISTRATE JUDGE HANNA JUDGMENT ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Considering the foregoing Report and Recommendation,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Approve the Settlement of Charlotte Bell, as Personal Representative and Derivative Claimant of the Estate of Lonnie Bell, is hereby GRANTED pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Hanna, which is hereby adopted.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Lafayette, Louisiana, this 4th day of April, 2017.

/s/_________

REBECCA F. DOHERTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bell v. Takeda Pharm. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Apr 4, 2017
MISC. CASE NO. 17-mc-70 (W.D. La. Apr. 4, 2017)
Case details for

Bell v. Takeda Pharm. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLOTTE BELL v. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED, ET AL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Apr 4, 2017

Citations

MISC. CASE NO. 17-mc-70 (W.D. La. Apr. 4, 2017)