From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 2, 2008
969 So. 2d 1115 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 4D06-3555.

November 7, 2007. Rehearing Denied January 2, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County, Gary L. Sweet, J.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Y. McIntire, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


In this appeal from a violation of probation proceeding, appellant timely raised the issue of a Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla. 1971), violation with respect to the state's most important witness. A Richardson hearing is required in a probation revocation proceeding. See Cuciak v. State, 410 So.2d 916 (Fla. 1982). The circuit court did not conduct a Richardson inquiry. The state has failed to demonstrate that the failure to conduct such a hearing was harmless. The state's witness had been drinking and using cocaine on the night in question, but said that she was not "obliviated." Although defense counsel had 30 minutes to interview the witness prior to the hearing, proper notice of the witness would have given the defense time to more fully develop an effective impeachment strategy.

Reversed and remanded.

KLEIN, GROSS, JJ., and EMAS, KEVIN, Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Bell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 2, 2008
969 So. 2d 1115 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Bell v. State

Case Details

Full title:Eddie BELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 2, 2008

Citations

969 So. 2d 1115 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)