From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Feb 10, 2012
381 P.3d 594 (Nev. 2012)

Opinion

No. 58004.

02-10-2012

William Mitchell BELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada; Howard Skolnick ; Nevada Department of Corrections ; Brian Williams; High Desert State Prison ; Albert Perata; Inmate Services/Inmate Banking Services.; and Catherine Cortez–Masto, Attorney General, Respondents.

William Mitchell Bell Attorney General/Carson City


William Mitchell Bell

Attorney General/Carson City

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is a proper person appeal from a district court order dismissing a tort action. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James Todd Russell, Judge.

The district court dismissed the complaint for appellant's failure to timely serve certain defendants or exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing his complaint. On appeal, appellant has not made any argument that the district court erred by dismissing his complaint, but instead, contends only that he needs to have counsel appointed to assist him with this appeal. See Edwards v. Emperor's Garden Rest., 122 Nev. 317, 330 n. 38, 130 P.3d 1280, 1288 n. 38 (2006) (providing that this court need not consider arguments not cogently made). Accordingly, as appellant has failed to address the district court's basis for dismissing the complaint, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Rae v. All American Life & Cas. Co., 95 Nev. 920, 922, 605 P.2d 196, 197 (1979) (holding that an individual named as a co-defendant is not a party unless he or she has been served).


Summaries of

Bell v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Feb 10, 2012
381 P.3d 594 (Nev. 2012)
Case details for

Bell v. State

Case Details

Full title:William Mitchell BELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada; Howard Skolnick…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Feb 10, 2012

Citations

381 P.3d 594 (Nev. 2012)