From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. South Carolina

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 25, 2018
No. 18-6068 (4th Cir. May. 25, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-6068

05-25-2018

JOHN JAMES BELL, Petitioner - Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF, Respondent - Appellee.

John James Bell, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (2:17-cv-02176-TMC) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John James Bell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

John James Bell appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bell v. South Carolina, No. 2:17-cv-02176-TMC (D.S.C. Jan. 2, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Bell v. South Carolina

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 25, 2018
No. 18-6068 (4th Cir. May. 25, 2018)
Case details for

Bell v. South Carolina

Case Details

Full title:JOHN JAMES BELL, Petitioner - Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 25, 2018

Citations

No. 18-6068 (4th Cir. May. 25, 2018)