Bell v. Meyers

Full title: JEROME BELL, Petitioner v. ROBERT MEYERS 1, et al. Respondents

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 29, 2004

Civil Action No. 02-3824 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 29, 2004)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 02-3824.

October 29, 2004

ORDER

GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge

AND NOW, this 29th day of October, 2004, upon consideration of the following: the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 of Jerome Bell; the Government's response thereto; the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jacob Hart; and the Objection filed by Mr. Bell to the Report and Recommendation andMerritt v. Blaine, 326 F.3d 157 (3d Cir. 2003);

it is hereby ORDERED that:

(1) The Objection to the Report and Recommendation is DENIED;

(2) The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

(3) The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY.