From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Machado

Supreme Court of Nevada
Oct 5, 1982
643 P.2d 1208 (Nev. 1982)

Opinion

No. 13206

April 28, 1982 Rehearing denied October 5, 1982

Appeal from Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; John W. Barrett, Judge.

David Hamilton, Reno, for Appellant.

Vargas Bartlett, by Phillip W. Bartlett, Reno, for Respondents.


OPINION


Eula M. Bell has appealed from an order dismissing her complaint after the close of her case pursuant to NRCP 41(b). The complaint alleged that respondents were negligent in placing a portable heater in Bell's motel room which injured her when she attempted unsuccessfully to step over the heater and instead fell against it, cutting her leg on a sharp corner.

Although there was conflicting testimony presented during the case in chief as to whether the corner of the heater was unduly sharp, the judge stated in granting the motion that he seriously doubted that the heater had a sharp edge and that the edge of the heater was the cause of Bell's injury. In reaching that conclusion the judge weighed the evidence, which is inappropriate when considering a motion under NRCP 41(b).

We have repeatedly stated that a "motion for involuntary dismissal admits the truth of plaintiff's evidence and all inferences that reasonably can be drawn therefrom, and the evidence must be interpreted in the light most favorable to plaintiff." Baley Selover v. All Amer. Van, 97 Nev. 370, 373, 632 P.2d 723, 724 (1981).

This case is reversed and remanded for a new trial.


Summaries of

Bell v. Machado

Supreme Court of Nevada
Oct 5, 1982
643 P.2d 1208 (Nev. 1982)
Case details for

Bell v. Machado

Case Details

Full title:EULA M. BELL, APPELLANT, v. JOSE MACHADO AND DOLORES MACHADO, DBA SANDMAN…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Oct 5, 1982

Citations

643 P.2d 1208 (Nev. 1982)
643 P.2d 1208

Citing Cases

Early v. N.L.V. Casino Corp.

" It is well-settled that a motion for involuntary dismissal pursuant to NRCP 41(b) "admits the truth of…