From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Hous. Auth. of City of Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2021
2:20-cv-02539-TLN-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-02539-TLN-JDP (PS)

09-28-2021

DELTHENIA BELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF DELTHENIA BELL'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

ECF NO. 37

JEREMY D. PETERSON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Delthenia Bell moves for an extension of time to file a sur-reply to defendants' reply on the pending motion to dismiss. ECF No. 37. Bell has no right to file a sur-reply; this case was fully briefed when the reply was filed. See Local Rule 230. If Bell feels the need to address information raised for the first time in the reply, she may file a motion for leave to file a sur-reply and attach the proposed document. Plaintiff Delthenia Bell's motion for extension of time is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bell v. Hous. Auth. of City of Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2021
2:20-cv-02539-TLN-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Bell v. Hous. Auth. of City of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:DELTHENIA BELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 28, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-02539-TLN-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)