From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Haney

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Mar 27, 2014
NO. 02-13-00239-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 27, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 02-13-00239-CV

03-27-2014

DEBORAH BELL APPELLANT v. DANNY L. HANEY APPELLEES


FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On February 28, 2014, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Bell v. Haney

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Mar 27, 2014
NO. 02-13-00239-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 27, 2014)
Case details for

Bell v. Haney

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH BELL APPELLANT v. DANNY L. HANEY APPELLEES

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Mar 27, 2014

Citations

NO. 02-13-00239-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 27, 2014)