From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Florida

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
May 5, 2017
4:16cv278-WS/CAS (N.D. Fla. May. 5, 2017)

Opinion

4:16cv278-WS/CAS

05-05-2017

MAURICE BELL, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S SECOND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's second report and recommendation (doc. 22) docketed April 11, 2017. The magistrate judge recommends that Plaintiff's Rule 60(b)(1)(4) motion to vacate judgment (doc. 21) be denied. Plaintiff has filed objections (doc. 23) to the report and recommendation. Having considered Plaintiff's motion to vacate judgment, the magistrate judge's report recommending denial of that motion, and Plaintiff's objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court concludes that Plaintiff's Rule 60(b) motion to vacate must be denied as recommended. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's second report and recommendation (doc. 22) is ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. Plaintiff's Rule 60(b)(1) motion to vacate (doc. 21) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of May, 2017.

s/ William Stafford

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bell v. Florida

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
May 5, 2017
4:16cv278-WS/CAS (N.D. Fla. May. 5, 2017)
Case details for

Bell v. Florida

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE BELL, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Date published: May 5, 2017

Citations

4:16cv278-WS/CAS (N.D. Fla. May. 5, 2017)