From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Flemming

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Oct 31, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-1760 (D.D.C. Oct. 31, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-1760

10-31-2012

MICHAEL BELL, Plaintiff, v. MARY FLEMMING, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on consideration of the plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed.

The plaintiff, a former employee of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, alleges that the defendants have mishandled his claim for worker's compensation benefits arising from an injury he sustained in January 1979. He demands $500,000 and full retirement benefits.

Federal district courts have jurisdiction in civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331. In addition, federal district courts have jurisdiction over civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds $75,000, and the suit is between citizens of different states. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). This complaint neither states a federal claim nor establishes diversity of citizenship of the parties. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

______________________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Bell v. Flemming

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Oct 31, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-1760 (D.D.C. Oct. 31, 2012)
Case details for

Bell v. Flemming

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BELL, Plaintiff, v. MARY FLEMMING, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Oct 31, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-1760 (D.D.C. Oct. 31, 2012)