From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. English

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Feb 8, 2019
CASE NO. 18-3232-SAC (D. Kan. Feb. 8, 2019)

Opinion

CASE NO. 18-3232-SAC

02-08-2019

STEVEN BELL, Plaintiff, v. (FNU) ENGLISH, Warden, USP-Leavenworth, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiff proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this prisoner civil rights action. On January 15, 2019, the Court entered a Memorandum and Order and Order to Show Cause (Doc. 8) ("MOSC"), granting Plaintiff until February 4, 2019, in which to show good cause why Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1) should not be dismissed for the reasons stated in the MOSC. Plaintiff was also granted until February 4, 2019, in which to file a complete and proper amended complaint to cure all the deficiencies set forth in the MOSC. Plaintiff has failed to respond to the MOSC.

In the MOSC, the Court found that Plaintiff failed to allege adequate facts to support a claim of retaliation. Plaintiff's claims of retaliation are generally conclusory, lacking facts to demonstrate any improper retaliatory motive. Furthermore, the staff member that Plaintiff claims retaliated against him is not named as a defendant. The Court also found that Plaintiff's complaint regarding the conditions of his confinement at USPL fails to state a claim of cruel and unusual punishment. Plaintiff alleges no facts showing that Defendants "both knew of and disregarded an excessive risk to [his] health or safety." Plaintiff's allegations fail to allege a "sufficiently serious" deprivation or facts showing he is "incarcerated under conditions posing a substantial risk of serious harm." Plaintiff has also failed to allege "deliberate indifference" by Defendants.

The MOSC provides that "[i]f Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint within the prescribed time that cures all the deficiencies discussed herein, this matter will be decided based upon the current deficient Complaint." Plaintiff has failed to respond to the MOSC within the allowed time. The Court finds that this case should be dismissed for the reasons set forth in the MOSC.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that this case is dismissed for failure to state a claim.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated in Topeka, Kansas, on this 8th day of February, 2019.

s/ Sam A. Crow

Sam A. Crow

U.S. Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Bell v. English

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Feb 8, 2019
CASE NO. 18-3232-SAC (D. Kan. Feb. 8, 2019)
Case details for

Bell v. English

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN BELL, Plaintiff, v. (FNU) ENGLISH, Warden, USP-Leavenworth, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Feb 8, 2019

Citations

CASE NO. 18-3232-SAC (D. Kan. Feb. 8, 2019)