From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Dow Chem. Co.

United States District Court, Middle District of Louisiana
Apr 25, 2022
Civil Action 21-326-SDD-SDD (M.D. La. Apr. 25, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 21-326-SDD-SDD

04-25-2022

JOHNITAL BELL, ET AL. v. THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, ET AL.


RULING AND ORDER

SHELLY D. DICK, CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has carefully considered the Motion, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Scott D. Johnson dated March 11, 2022, to which an Objection was filed. The Court conducted a de novo review.

Rec. Doc. 19.

Rec. Doc. 63.

Rec. Doc. 64.

The Court hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein.

ACCORDINGLY, Plaintiffs' Motion for Remand is DENIED.

Rec. Doc. 19.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' claims against the non-diverse Individual Defendants, Michael Albano, Dan Bucholtz, Kim Feltner, Sandy Holden, Dan Jason, Donald Lyle, Lance Parker, Robert Samson, Jennifer Smith, Theo Webre, Karen Williams, Eric Robertson, Larry Locicero, and Roland Lambotte, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Bell v. Dow Chem. Co.

United States District Court, Middle District of Louisiana
Apr 25, 2022
Civil Action 21-326-SDD-SDD (M.D. La. Apr. 25, 2022)
Case details for

Bell v. Dow Chem. Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOHNITAL BELL, ET AL. v. THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, ET AL.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Louisiana

Date published: Apr 25, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 21-326-SDD-SDD (M.D. La. Apr. 25, 2022)