From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Crosby

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division
Feb 8, 2006
Case No. 4:04-cv-00505-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 8, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 4:04-cv-00505-MP-EMT.

February 8, 2006


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Doc. 23, Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, recommending that Doc. 1, Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Maurice Bell, be denied. The Magistrate Judge filed the Report and Recommendation on Thursday, January 5, 2006. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo review of those portions to which an objection has been made. In this instance, however, no objections were made. Therefore, having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be ADOPTED. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus, Doc. 1, is denied.
DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bell v. Crosby

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division
Feb 8, 2006
Case No. 4:04-cv-00505-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 8, 2006)
Case details for

Bell v. Crosby

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE BELL, Petitioner, v. JAMES V. CROSBY, JR., Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division

Date published: Feb 8, 2006

Citations

Case No. 4:04-cv-00505-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 8, 2006)