From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia
Dec 9, 1850
48 Va. 201 (Va. 1850)

Opinion

12-09-1850

BELL v. THE COMMONWEALTH.

Irvine for the applicant.


(Absent Cabell, P. and Brooke, J.)

The Court of appeals has no jurisdiction to grant a writ of error in a criminal case, or to a judgment upon an application for a writ of habeas corpus.

Bell being confined in the jail of the county of Buckingham under a charge of larceny, applied to the Judge of the Circuit court of that county for a habeas corpus, and asked for his discharge, on the ground that he had not been brought to trial for three terms of the Court after he had been sent on for trial by the examining Court. The Circuit Judge upon a hearing of the case, refused to discharge the prisoner; and he thereupon applied to this Court for a writ of error to the judgment of the Court below.

Irvine for the applicant.

OPINION

ALLEN, J.

The Court is of opinion, that as by the act concerning the writ of habeas corpus, ch. 156, page 613, Code of 1850, no provision is made giving to this Court jurisdiction to grant a writ of error to a judgment upon an application for a habeas corpus, and as by the act concerning appeals and writs of error and supersedeas, Code of 1850, p. 682, the jurisdiction to grant a writ of error or supersedeas is confined to judgments in civil cases, this Court has no jurisdiction to grant a writ of error in a criminal case.


Summaries of

Bell v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia
Dec 9, 1850
48 Va. 201 (Va. 1850)
Case details for

Bell v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:BELL v. THE COMMONWEALTH.

Court:Supreme Court of Virginia

Date published: Dec 9, 1850

Citations

48 Va. 201 (Va. 1850)