From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. City Security Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1906
113 App. Div. 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)

Opinion

May, 1906.


Submission dismissed on the ground that the agreed statement of facts shows that the plaintiffs have no cause of action against the defendant for specific performance, the purchase of the real estate having been made at a judicial sale in foreclosure, the remedy for a failure to complete being by motion in the foreclosure action. Hirschberg, P.J., Woodward, Jenks, Hooker and Miller, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Bell v. City Security Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1906
113 App. Div. 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
Case details for

Bell v. City Security Company

Case Details

Full title:Philip T. Bell and Others, as Executors, etc., of James C. Bell, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1906

Citations

113 App. Div. 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
99 N.Y.S. 1134