From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Bral

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2016
Case No.: CV15-6171 DSF (PJWx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2016)

Opinion

Case No.: CV15-6171 DSF (PJWx)

09-20-2016

ANTHONY BELL, Plaintiff, v. RAMIN BRAL; et. al, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

The Court having granted the motion for summary adjudication by Defendant Kimleang Say, and having previously dismissed Defendant Ramin Bral with prejudice subject to an agreement that Kimleang Say not take the position at trial, or during any other stage of proceedings in this case, that the violations/breaches that were the subject of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint were the result of any act, omission, or breach of duty by Ramin Bral, and having dismissed the state law claims without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c),

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff Anthony Bell take nothing and that Defendant Kimleang Say recover the costs of suit pursuant to a bill of costs filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1920. Dated: 9/20/16

/s/_________

Dale S. Fischer

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Bell v. Bral

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2016
Case No.: CV15-6171 DSF (PJWx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2016)
Case details for

Bell v. Bral

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY BELL, Plaintiff, v. RAMIN BRAL; et. al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 20, 2016

Citations

Case No.: CV15-6171 DSF (PJWx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2016)