From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Bowersox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 22, 2015
No. 4:97CV00324 ERW (E.D. Mo. Jan. 22, 2015)

Opinion

No. 4:97CV00324 ERW

01-22-2015

KENNETH BELL, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL BOWERSOX, Respondent


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Petitioner moves for reconsideration of the Court's Order denying his motion under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Petitioner argues that § 2254's prohibition on bringing freestanding claims for ineffectiveness of postconviction counsel is unconstitutional, and he wishes to reopen the case for the purpose of litigating such claims. The request is frivolous. Petitioner cannot bring new claims for habeas relief without first receiving permission from the Court of Appeals. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b).

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motions for reconsideration [ECF Nos. 67, 68] are DENIED with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability.

So Ordered this 22nd day of January, 2015.

/s/_________

E. RICHARD WEBBER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bell v. Bowersox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Jan 22, 2015
No. 4:97CV00324 ERW (E.D. Mo. Jan. 22, 2015)
Case details for

Bell v. Bowersox

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH BELL, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL BOWERSOX, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 22, 2015

Citations

No. 4:97CV00324 ERW (E.D. Mo. Jan. 22, 2015)