From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. New York
May 14, 2010
5:09-CV-0037 (N.D.N.Y. May. 14, 2010)

Opinion

5:09-CV-0037.

May 14, 2010

Jaya Shurtliff, Esq., Olinsky, Shurtliff Law Firm, Syracuse, NY, Counsel for Plaintiff.

Karen G. Fiszer, Esq., Social Security Administration, Office of Regional General Counsel, Region II, New York, NY, Counsel for Defendant.


ORDER


The above matter comes to me following a Report-Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini, duly filed on the 27th day of April 2010. Following ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent me the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein.

After careful review of all of the papers herein, including the Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, and no objections submitted thereto, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The Report-Recommendation is hereby adopted in its entirety.

2. The Commissioner's decision denying disability benefits is remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the Report-Recommendation and pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g).

3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon all parties and the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bell v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. New York
May 14, 2010
5:09-CV-0037 (N.D.N.Y. May. 14, 2010)
Case details for

Bell v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:VICTORIA BELL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: May 14, 2010

Citations

5:09-CV-0037 (N.D.N.Y. May. 14, 2010)

Citing Cases

Stanton v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Plaintiff is correct that Tinel and Phalen sign tests are commonly accepted tests to diagnose carpal tunnel…