From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Ardagh Grp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
Oct 3, 2019
No. 1:19-cv-01171-TWP-MJD (S.D. Ind. Oct. 3, 2019)

Opinion

No. 1:19-cv-01171-TWP-MJD

10-03-2019

ANTOINETTE TAKIA BELL, Plaintiff, v. ARDAGH GROUP S.A., Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff's motion to strike Defendant's affirmative defenses (Dkt. 33). The parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this Court to file objections; none were filed. The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The Plaintiff's motions to strike Defendant's affirmative defenses (Dkt. 19 and Dkt. 27) are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 10/3/2019

/s/_________

TANYA WALTON PRATT, JUDGE

United States District Court

Southern District of Indiana Distribution: ANTOINETTE TAKIA BELL
12240 Misty Way
Indianapolis, IN 46236 Brian L. McDermott
JACKSON LEWIS PC (Indianapolis)
brian.mcdermott@jacksonlewis.com Caitlin S. Schroeder
JACKSON LEWIS PC (Indianapolis)
caitlin.schroeder@jacksonlewis.com


Summaries of

Bell v. Ardagh Grp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
Oct 3, 2019
No. 1:19-cv-01171-TWP-MJD (S.D. Ind. Oct. 3, 2019)
Case details for

Bell v. Ardagh Grp.

Case Details

Full title:ANTOINETTE TAKIA BELL, Plaintiff, v. ARDAGH GROUP S.A., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Date published: Oct 3, 2019

Citations

No. 1:19-cv-01171-TWP-MJD (S.D. Ind. Oct. 3, 2019)

Citing Cases

Brown v. Rosie's Place Zionsville, LLC

(Dkt. 8 at 10). While courts have held that such cursory defenses are usually insufficient, courts typically…