From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell-Boston v. Safeway

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Feb 16, 2009
Civil Action No. 09 0437 (D.D.C. Feb. 16, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09 0437.

February 16, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This matter comes before the Court on consideration of plaintiff's pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application, and dismiss the complaint.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff dropped a sheet cake in a Safeway store located in the District of Columbia (Compl. at 1), and was subsequently barred from the store for a year ( id. at 2). Federal district courts have jurisdiction in civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States, see 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and in civil actions in matters where the controversy exceeds $75,000 and is between citizens of different states, see 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Here, however, the complaint does not explicitly identify a basis for this Court's jurisdiction, identify a claim arising under the laws of the United States, or otherwise provide sufficient information for the Court to discern a basis for its jurisdiction. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss the complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. An appropriate order accompanies this memorandum opinion.


Summaries of

Bell-Boston v. Safeway

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Feb 16, 2009
Civil Action No. 09 0437 (D.D.C. Feb. 16, 2009)
Case details for

Bell-Boston v. Safeway

Case Details

Full title:Kareemah Bell-Boston, Plaintiff, v. Safeway, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Feb 16, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 09 0437 (D.D.C. Feb. 16, 2009)