From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell-Boston v. King

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Oct 26, 2012
Civil Action No. 12 1857 (D.D.C. Oct. 26, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12 1857

10-26-2012

Kareemah Bell-Boston, Plaintiff, v. Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Library, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff's pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the plaintiff's application and dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

The subject matter jurisdiction of the federal district courts is limited and is set forth generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdiction is available only when a "federal question" is presented or the parties are of diverse citizenship and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking relief in the district court must at least plead facts that bring the suit within the court's jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Failure to plead such facts warrants dismissal of the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3).

The plaintiff is a District of Columbia resident "looking to sue Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial Library [in the District of Columbia] for Defamation of Character." Statement of the Case at 2. Since the complaint neither presents a federal question nor provides a basis for diversity jurisdiction, it will be dismissed.

A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

________

Unite States District Judge


Summaries of

Bell-Boston v. King

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Oct 26, 2012
Civil Action No. 12 1857 (D.D.C. Oct. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Bell-Boston v. King

Case Details

Full title:Kareemah Bell-Boston, Plaintiff, v. Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Oct 26, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12 1857 (D.D.C. Oct. 26, 2012)