finding that the district court "properly declined to address" an "ineffective assistance of counsel claim raised for the first time in the objections to the magistrate judge's recommendations" (citing George , 971 F.2d at 1117–18 )
Summary of this case from Samples v. BallardNo. 98-1061.
May 26, 1998.
E.D.Va., 10 F.Supp.2d 575.
Affirmed
finding that the district court "properly declined to address" an "ineffective assistance of counsel claim raised for the first time in the objections to the magistrate judge's recommendations" (citing George , 971 F.2d at 1117–18 )
Summary of this case from Samples v. Ballardupholding district court's 12(b) dismissal of claims based on a grooming policy requiring that braided hairstyles be secured to the head or at the nape of the neck
Summary of this case from Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. Catastrophe Mgmt. Sols.upholding district court's 12(b) dismissal of claims based on a grooming policy requiring that braided hairstyles be secured to the head or at the nape of the neck
Summary of this case from Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. Catastrophe Mgmt. Sols.applying District of Columbia law
Summary of this case from Sysco v. HarrellFull title:Bell Atlantic Washington, DC, Inc. v. Zaidi
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Date published: May 26, 1998
We therefore conclude that the Paragraph 7 stipulation that SYSCO is entitled to damages in the amount it…
Williams v. United StatesAccordingly, to prevent dismissal, "the nonmoving party must set forth specific facts beyond the pleadings to…