From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Belinkie v. Zucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 19, 1998
255 A.D.2d 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 19, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.).


Assuming that it was a negligent lapse of building security for defendants to permit a tenant to use his residential apartment as an office in violation of the building's certificate of occupancy, we agree with the motion court that, as a matter of law, it was not a normal or foreseeable consequence of such negligence that the tenant would employ a bookkeeper who would burglarize and assault another tenant in the building ( see, Derdiarian v. Felix Contr. Corp., 51 N.Y.2d 308, 315-316).

Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

Belinkie v. Zucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 19, 1998
255 A.D.2d 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Belinkie v. Zucker

Case Details

Full title:CAROL BELINKIE, Also Known as CARRIE JILER, Appellant, v. DONALD ZUCKER et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 19, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 219 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 15

Citing Cases

Virella v. 245 N. St. Hous. Dev. Fund Corp.

f was foreseeable" ( Firpi v. New York City Housing Auth. , 175 A.D.2d 858, 859, 573 N.Y.S.2d 704 [2d Dept.…

Belinkie v. Zucker

Decided February 23, 1999 Appeal from (1st Dept: 255 A.D.2d 219). Motion for leave to appeal granted or…