From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Belfont Sales Corporation v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
May 23, 1989
878 F.2d 1413 (Fed. Cir. 1989)

Opinion

No. 89-1078.

May 23, 1989.

Steven R. Sosnov, Sosnov Associates, Norristown, Pa., argued for plaintiff-appellee.

James A. Curley, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, New York City, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were John R. Bolton, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge, Intern. Trade Field Office. Also on the brief was Edward N. Maurer, U.S. Customs Service, of counsel.

Appealed from: U.S. Court of International Trade; Aquilino, Judge.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and ARCHER, Circuit Judges.


The United States appeals the decision of the United States Court of International Trade holding that battery-operated quartz analog watches are classified, and dutiable as an entirety, under item 688.45 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States. Belfont Sales Corp. v. United States, 666 F. Supp. 1568 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1987), reh'g denied, 698 F. Supp. 916 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1988). The decision of the Court of International Trade is affirmed, for the reasons stated in that court's published opinion.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Belfont Sales Corporation v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
May 23, 1989
878 F.2d 1413 (Fed. Cir. 1989)
Case details for

Belfont Sales Corporation v. United States

Case Details

Full title:BELFONT SALES CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. THE UNITED STATES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: May 23, 1989

Citations

878 F.2d 1413 (Fed. Cir. 1989)

Citing Cases

Marcel Watch Co. v. U.S.

Instead, the court held that the watches were properly classified under Item 688.45 of Schedule 6, TSUS. The…