From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Belew v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 24, 1993
616 So. 2d 120 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 91-03442.

March 24, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, R. Grable Stoutamire, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Enrique Escarraz, III, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Donna A. Provonsha, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We affirm defendant's conviction without comment. However, it appears that no sentencing guidelines scoresheet was ever filed. Thus, in "an abundance of caution," we remand this case to the trial court to clarify whether the guidelines scoresheet referred to by the state and defense counsel at the sentencing hearing was "physically present before the judge and the court on the date of sentencing." Caracciolo v. State, 564 So.2d 1162, 1163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

Affirmed but remanded.

DANAHY, A.C.J., HALL, J., and ROBERTS, SUSAN W., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Belew v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 24, 1993
616 So. 2d 120 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Belew v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BELEW, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 24, 1993

Citations

616 So. 2d 120 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Hinkle v. State

We do, however, remand "to clarify whether the guidelines scoresheet referred to by the state and defense…