From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Belcorp Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Estate of Wetzel

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Apr 15, 2014
847 N.W.2d 425 (Wis. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 2013AP662.

2014-04-15

BELCORP FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. ESTATE OF Richard B. WETZEL and Ruth I. Wetzel, Defendants–Respondents, M & I Bank of Eagle River, Vilas County and Wisconsin Child Support Agency, Defendants.

The forbearance agreement, by its terms, waives any defenses to “obligations under their personal guaranty.” As noted above, however, the underlying guaranty was invalid: Wetzel's defenses remained viable, including the forgery defense. Ultimately, the forbearance agreement cannot legitimize a conveyance that did not meet the Wis. Stat. § 706.02 requirements. The circuit court properly granted the Wetzels' motion for summary judgment on the invalid mortgage. (Emphasis added.) The statute further provides: “If, after notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond, the court determines that sub. (2) has been violated, the court may impose an appropriate sanction upon the attorneys, law firms, or parties that have violated sub. (2) or are responsible for the violation.” Wis. Stat. § 802.05(3).



Summaries of

Belcorp Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Estate of Wetzel

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Apr 15, 2014
847 N.W.2d 425 (Wis. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Belcorp Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Estate of Wetzel

Case Details

Full title:BELCORP FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. ESTATE OF…

Court:Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Date published: Apr 15, 2014

Citations

847 N.W.2d 425 (Wis. Ct. App. 2014)
354 Wis. 2d 323
2014 WI App. 63