From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bekins v. Dieterle

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
May 25, 1907
5 Cal.App. 586 (Cal. Ct. App. 1907)

Opinion

Civ. No. 372.

May 25, 1907.

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from part of a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. W. P. James, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

J. Marion Brooks, and Henry E. Willis, for Appellant.

E. W. Freeman, and A.D. Laughlin, for Respondent.


Motion to dismiss an appeal from that portion of the judgment wherein it was adjudged "that the temporary injunction heretofore issued herein to the sheriff of said county be and the same is hereby dissolved and vacated."

The appeal was not taken within sixty days from the entry of this judgment, and upon this ground respondent insists that the same should be dismissed. The judgment was not an order within the meaning of section 939 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and the motion to dismiss is denied.

Allen, P. J., and Taggart, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Bekins v. Dieterle

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
May 25, 1907
5 Cal.App. 586 (Cal. Ct. App. 1907)
Case details for

Bekins v. Dieterle

Case Details

Full title:KATE BEKINS, Appellant, v. MINNIE DIETERLE and WILLIAM DIETERLE…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District

Date published: May 25, 1907

Citations

5 Cal.App. 586 (Cal. Ct. App. 1907)
91 P. 105