From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Begam v. Damast [2d Dept 1999

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 4, 1999
(N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 4, 1999)

Opinion

Submitted June 16, 1999

October 4, 1999

Parker Waichman (DiJoseph, Portegello Schuster, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Arnold E. DiJoseph III of counsel), for appellants.

Jacobowitz, Garfinkel Lesman, New York, N.Y. (Fiedelman McGaw [William D. Buckley] of counsel), for respondent.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., DAVID S. RITTER, DANIEL W. JOY, MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Belen, J.), dated August 27, 1998, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as barred by Workers' Compensation Law § 29 Work. Comp.(6).

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly awarded the defendant summary judgment as the action is barred by the exclusivity of the Workers' Compensation remedy (see, Workers' Compensation Law § 29 Work. Comp.[6]).

O'BRIEN, J.P., RITTER, JOY, ALTMAN, and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Begam v. Damast [2d Dept 1999

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 4, 1999
(N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 4, 1999)
Case details for

Begam v. Damast [2d Dept 1999

Case Details

Full title:Anatoli Begam, et al., appellants, v. Abraham Damast, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 4, 1999

Citations

(N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 4, 1999)