Opinion
June Term, 1897.
Judgment of the County Court and of the Justice's Court reversed, with costs. Held, that, at the time the services in question were rendered by the plaintiffs, they knew that the defendant was the owner of the premises, and that with this knowledge they elected to charge her husband for the services thus rendered, and that there was no evidence that the defendant in any manner ordered the work done or assumed any direction in regard thereto. All concurred, except Follett, J., not voting.