Opinion
2015-UP-567
12-23-2015
Mary Anne Goldsmith Beeson, Appellant, v. Joseph Alford Crews Beeson, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2014-001983
J. Falkner Wilkes, of Greenville, for Appellant. David James Brousseau, of McIntosh, Sherard, Sullivan & Brousseau, of Anderson, for Respondent.
Unpublished Opinion
Submitted October 1, 2015
Appeal From Anderson County Edgar H. Long, Jr., Family Court Judge
J. Falkner Wilkes, of Greenville, for Appellant.
David James Brousseau, of McIntosh, Sherard, Sullivan & Brousseau, of Anderson, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Crossland v. Crossland, 408 S.C. 443, 451, 759 S.E.2d 419, 423 (2014) ("In appeals from the family court, this [c]ourt reviews factual and legal issues de novo."); Mick-Skaggs v. Skaggs, 411 S.C. 94, 101, 766 S.E.2d 870, 873, (Ct. App. 2014) ([D]e novo review neither relieves an appellant of demonstrating error nor requires us to ignore the findings of the family court."); S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-620(C) (2014) ("The [family] court's order as it affects distribution of marital property shall be a final order not subject to modification except by appeal or remand following proper appeal."); Simpson v. Simpson, 404 S.C. 563, 571, 746 S.E.2d 54, 58-59 (Ct. App. 2013) ("[T]he law in South Carolina is exceedingly clear that the family court does not have the authority to modify court ordered property divisions." (quoting Green v. Green, 327 S.C. 577, 581, 491 S.E.2d 260, 262 (Ct. App. 1997))).
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
FEW, C.J., and KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.