From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beers v. Broad and Market Nat. Bank

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 20, 1930
151 A. 905 (N.J. 1930)

Opinion

Submitted May 31, 1930 —

Decided October 20, 1930.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 102 N.J.L. 5.

For the appellant, Merritt Lane.

For the respondent, Leber Ruback.


We conclude that the judgment under review should be affirmed, and that it is sufficient to rest our affirmance upon the second ground contained in the opinion of the Supreme Court, ubi supra, without special consideration or discussion of the first ground set out in that opinion.

The judgment will accordingly be affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Beers v. Broad and Market Nat. Bank

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 20, 1930
151 A. 905 (N.J. 1930)
Case details for

Beers v. Broad and Market Nat. Bank

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS J. BEERS, APPELLANT, v. BROAD AND MARKET NATIONAL BANK OF NEWARK…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 20, 1930

Citations

151 A. 905 (N.J. 1930)
151 A. 905

Citing Cases

Central Tr. Co. v. Estes

There was never any intimation that Estes or Grimes demanded or expected a return or cancellation of the…