From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beeman v. Caremark Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jul 10, 2004
EDCV 02-1327-VAP (SGLx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2004)

Opinion


JERRY BEEMAN AND PHARMACY SERVICES, INC, dba BEEMAN'S PHARMACY; ANTHONY HUTCHINSON AND ROCIDA, INC, dba FINLEY'S REXALL DRUG; CHARLES MILLER dba MEDICINE SHOPPE, JIM MORISOLI AND AMERICAN SURGICAL PHARMACY, INC., dba AMERICAN SURGICAL PHARMACY, BILL PEARSON AND PEARSON AND HOUSE, dba PEARSON'S MEDICAL GROUP PHARMACY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public, Plaintiffs, v. CAREMARK INC.; TDI MANAGED CARE SERVICES, INC. dba ECKERD HEALTH SERVICES; MEDCO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC, EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC.; and ADVANCE PCS, Defendants. No. EDCV 02-1327-VAP (SGLx) United States District Court, C.D. California. July 10, 2004

          JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS

          VIRGINIA PHILLIPS, District Judge.

         TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD

         Pursuant to the Order filed herewith, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and the entire action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court orders that such judgment be entered.


Summaries of

Beeman v. Caremark Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jul 10, 2004
EDCV 02-1327-VAP (SGLx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2004)
Case details for

Beeman v. Caremark Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JERRY BEEMAN AND PHARMACY SERVICES, INC, dba BEEMAN'S PHARMACY; ANTHONY…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jul 10, 2004

Citations

EDCV 02-1327-VAP (SGLx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2004)