Opinion
CA 02-01849
October 9, 2003.
Appeals and cross appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (O'Donnell, J.), entered May 9, 2002, which, inter alia, denied the motion of defendant Volney R. Spencer for a bifurcated trial with respect to action Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
CHELUS, HERDZIK, SPEYER, MONTE PAJAK, P.C., BUFFALO (ARTHUR A. HERDZIK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT.
MISERENDINO, CELNIKER, SEEGERT ESTOFF, P.C., BUFFALO (JOY ELLEN MISERENDINO OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT TINA M. BEELEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF LAUREN A. BEELEY, AN INFANT, AND FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT TINA M. BEELEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF LYNNE M. BEELEY, AN INFANT.
LAW OFFICE OF MARY A. BJORK, BUFFALO, RUPP, BAASE, PFALZGRAF CUNNINGHAM LLC, BUFFALO (JEFFREY F. BAASE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
WEBSTER SZANYI LLP, BUFFALO (THOMAS S. LANE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
FELDMAN, KIEFFER HERMAN, LLP, BUFFALO (GERARD A. STRAUSS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT JOSEPH F. CEGIELSKI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF LISA CEGIELSKI, AN INFANT.
PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., GREEN, PINE, SCUDDER, AND HAYES, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeals and cross appeal be and the same hereby are unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same Memorandum as in Beeley v. Spencer ([appeal No. 5] 309 A.D.2d 1303 [Oct. 9, 2003]).