From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beekman v. Paskin

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 11, 1933
147 Misc. 563 (N.Y. App. Term 1933)

Opinion

May 11, 1933.

Appeal from the Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Sixth District.

John P. Smith [James P. Allen, Jr., of counsel], for the appellant

Elliott Lasker, for the respondent.


Since the assured's employee was injured by a third person, the assured was under no common-law liability to provide him with medical treatment. Under section 13 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law her duty to furnish such treatment terminated when the employee filed his notice of election to sue the third party. Under the terms of the policy the insurance company was under no liability to indemnify her for medical expenses which she voluntarily incurred thereafter.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and supplemental complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

All concur; present, LEVY, CALLAHAN and UNTERMYER, JJ.


Summaries of

Beekman v. Paskin

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 11, 1933
147 Misc. 563 (N.Y. App. Term 1933)
Case details for

Beekman v. Paskin

Case Details

Full title:LEON BEEKMAN, Plaintiff, v. RUTH PASKIN, Defendant, Respondent, and…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: May 11, 1933

Citations

147 Misc. 563 (N.Y. App. Term 1933)
264 N.Y.S. 213

Citing Cases

United States Casualty v. N. Am. Brewing Co.

At common law an employer need not provide medical attendance for such an employee even in an emergency,…