From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beekman v. IndyMac Fed. Bank

Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 2, 2014
145 So. 3d 821 (Fla. 2014)

Opinion

No. SC13–1410.

2014-04-2

James G. BEEKMAN, Petitioner(s) v. INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, etc., et al., Respondent(s).


Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla.2000).

PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Beekman v. IndyMac Fed. Bank

Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 2, 2014
145 So. 3d 821 (Fla. 2014)
Case details for

Beekman v. IndyMac Fed. Bank

Case Details

Full title:James G. BEEKMAN, Petitioner(s) v. INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, etc., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Apr 2, 2014

Citations

145 So. 3d 821 (Fla. 2014)