From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beecham v. Spectrum Brands, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Jan 6, 2021
No. 20-2327-JTM (D. Kan. Jan. 6, 2021)

Opinion

No. 20-2327-JTM

01-06-2021

TAWANA M. BEECHAM, Plaintiff, v. SPECTRUM BRANDS, INC., et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on defendant Spectrum Brands' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 10), which argues relief cannot be granted to the pro se plaintiff because (1) the Complaint is untimely, (2) plaintiff has failed to properly serve any defendant, and (3) the Complaint fails to state a plausible claim for relief. More than four months have elapsed since defendant's August 19, 2020 Motion to Dismiss, and the plaintiff has not filed any response to the motion, or asked for additional time to attempt a response. Accordingly, both for good cause shown and pursuant to D.Kan.R. 7.4, defendant's motion (Dkt. 10) is hereby granted.

The Rule provides if a timely response (here, 21 days) "the court will consider and decide the motion as an uncontested motion. Ordinarily, the court will grant the motion without further notice." --------

IT IS SO ORDERED this day of January, 2021.

J . Thomas Marten

J. Thomas Marten, Judge


Summaries of

Beecham v. Spectrum Brands, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Jan 6, 2021
No. 20-2327-JTM (D. Kan. Jan. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Beecham v. Spectrum Brands, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TAWANA M. BEECHAM, Plaintiff, v. SPECTRUM BRANDS, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Jan 6, 2021

Citations

No. 20-2327-JTM (D. Kan. Jan. 6, 2021)