From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bednarczyk v. King Cnty.

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jul 10, 2019
193 Wash. 2d 1017 (Wash. 2019)

Opinion

No. 96990-6

07-10-2019

Nicole BEDNARCZYK, et al., Petitioners, v. KING COUNTY, Respondent.


ORDER

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its July 9, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is granted. Any party may serve and file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of this order, see RAP 13.7(d).

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Bednarczyk v. King Cnty.

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jul 10, 2019
193 Wash. 2d 1017 (Wash. 2019)
Case details for

Bednarczyk v. King Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:Nicole BEDNARCZYK, et al., Petitioners, v. KING COUNTY, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Jul 10, 2019

Citations

193 Wash. 2d 1017 (Wash. 2019)
448 P.3d 64

Citing Cases

Rocha v. King Cnty.

The dissenting opinion did not address the MWA issue. Rocha v. King County, 7 Wash. App. 2d 647, 435 P.3d…