From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bedford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 13, 1992
598 So. 2d 285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-01463.

May 13, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Harry Lee Coe, III, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and John S. Lynch, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


The appellant appeals his revocation of probation and resulting ten year prison sentence. We find no merit in the appellant's claim that the trial court was without jurisdiction to revoke probation and thus affirm as to the revocation.

On revocation of probation, the trial court in sentencing the appellant departed upward more than one cell based on the appellant's having had multiple violations of probation. Subsequently, the Florida Supreme Court held that multiple violations of probation are not a proper reason for a guidelines departure. Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 284 (Fla. 1992). Williams also held, however, that "where there are multiple violations of probation, the sentence may be successively bumped to one higher cell for each violation." Therefore, the sentence in this case is set aside and the cause remanded for resentencing consistent with Williams. See also O'Keefe v. State, 595 So.2d 291 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and BLUE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bedford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 13, 1992
598 So. 2d 285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Bedford v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE LEE BEDFORD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 13, 1992

Citations

598 So. 2d 285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Korynes v. State

We note that the trial court may "bump" the recommended sentence by one cell for each violation of probation…

Jones v. State

The state concedes that these reasons are insufficient. Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273 (Fla. 1992).…