From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beckman v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 17, 2015
No. 67920 (Nev. Dec. 17, 2015)

Opinion

No. 67920

12-17-2015

JEREMY LEIGH BECKMAN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is a pro se appeal from an order of the district court denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; J. Charles Thompson, Senior Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument, NRAP 34(f)(3), and we conclude that the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. See Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911 (1975).

In his petition filed on February 4, 2015, appellant claimed that his counsel was ineffective for failing to file a direct appeal despite being requested to do so. We conclude that the district court did not err in denying the petition. Appellant expressly waived the right to a direct appeal as a term of the plea negotiations. Thus, trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to file a direct appeal under these circumstances. See Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 58-59 (1985); Kirksey v. State, 112 Nev. 980, 988, 923 P.2d 1102, 1107 (1996). Accordingly, we

Appellant stated that he wanted to appeal from the denial of a presentence motion to withdraw a guilty plea. However, there is no independent appeal from the denial of a presentence motion to withdraw a guilty plea; the denial of a presentence motion to withdraw a guilty plea may be challenged in a direct appeal. See Hargrove v. State, 100 Nev. 498, 502 n.3, 686 P.2d 222, 225 n.3 (1984).

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in pro se to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance. --------

/s/_________, J.

Saitta

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons

/s/_________, J.

Pickering cc: Chief Judge, The Eighth Judicial District Court

Hon. J. Charles Thompson, Senior Judge

Jeremy Leigh Beckman

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Beckman v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 17, 2015
No. 67920 (Nev. Dec. 17, 2015)
Case details for

Beckman v. State

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY LEIGH BECKMAN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Dec 17, 2015

Citations

No. 67920 (Nev. Dec. 17, 2015)