From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beckford v. Milano Furniture Warehouse Inc.

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Nov 20, 2019
65 Misc. 3d 150 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)

Opinion

570584/19

11-20-2019

Susan BECKFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MILANO FURNITURE WAREHOUSE INC.


Per Curiam.

Appeal from judgment (Lyle E. Frank, J.), entered on or about August 28, 2018, held in abeyance and the matter remanded to Civil Court for issuance of a decision in conformity with the requirements of CPLR 4213(b).

The trial court failed to comply with the specificity requirements of CPLR 4213(b) in rendering judgment in defendant's favor without setting forth its rationale or the facts essential to its determination. Inasmuch as this small claims action hinges in large measure upon issues of credibility raised by the parties' conflicting testimony, we hold the appeal in abeyance and remand the matter for issuance of a decision setting forth the essential facts as required by CPLR 4213(b) (see Brenner v. De Bruin , 171 AD2d 833 [1991] ; Ozzy Constr. Co. v. Scott , 35 Misc 3d 139[A], 2012 NY Slip Op 50849[U][App Term, 1st Dept 2012] ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


Summaries of

Beckford v. Milano Furniture Warehouse Inc.

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Nov 20, 2019
65 Misc. 3d 150 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
Case details for

Beckford v. Milano Furniture Warehouse Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Susan Beckford, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Milano Furniture Warehouse Inc.,

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: Nov 20, 2019

Citations

65 Misc. 3d 150 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 51858
119 N.Y.S.3d 674