From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beckett v. State

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Oct 30, 1973
211 N.W.2d 514 (Wis. 1973)

Opinion

No. State 142.

Submitted under sec. (Rule) 251.54 October 3, 1973. —

Decided October 30, 1973.

ERROR to review a judgment of the county court of Racine county: WILLIAM F. JONES, Judge.

For the plaintiff in error the cause was submitted on the brief of Arthur B. Nathan of Racine.

For the defendant in error the cause was submitted on the brief of Robert W. Warren, attorney general, and James P. Altman, assistant attorney general.


After reviewing the record in this case and the circumstantial evidence amassed by the prosecution, the court concludes the jury in this case acting reasonably could have been convinced of the plaintiff in error's guilt of the crime of arson, beyond a reasonable doubt. That is the test applied by this court when the sufficiency of the evidence is raised. Bautista v. State (1971), 53 Wis.2d 218, 191 N.W.2d 725; State v. Kitkowski (1969), 44 Wis.2d 259, 170 N.W.2d 703.

The court also concludes the imposition of a ten-year sentence on the plaintiff in error for the arson of an occupied dwelling was not an abuse of discretion and the sentence was not excessive under the circumstances of this case.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Beckett v. State

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Oct 30, 1973
211 N.W.2d 514 (Wis. 1973)
Case details for

Beckett v. State

Case Details

Full title:BECKETT, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error

Court:Supreme Court of Wisconsin

Date published: Oct 30, 1973

Citations

211 N.W.2d 514 (Wis. 1973)
211 N.W.2d 514

Citing Cases

Beckett v. State

Insofar as the record reflects, no appeal was taken from the denial, although the conviction on the unrelated…