From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Becker v. Skype Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Jun 20, 2014
12-cv-06477 EJD (N.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2014)

Opinion

          Joseph E. Addiego III, DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP, San Francisco, California, Karen A. Henry, DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP, Los Angeles, California, Stephen M. Rummage, (admitted pro hac vice), DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP, Seattle, WA, Attorneys for Defendants, SKYPE INC. and MICROSOFT CORPORATION.

          ROBERT S. ARNS, STEVEN R. WEINMANN, JONATHAN E. DAVIS, THE ARNS LAW FIRM, and JONATHAN M. JAFFE, JONATHAN JAFFE LAW, and KATHRYN A. STEBNER, STEBNER AND ASSOCIATES, Attorneys for Plaintiffs, JOSEPHINE ASPLUND and DARRIN WESLEY.


          STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE [F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

          EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge.

         Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of all claims of Plaintiffs Josephine Asplund and Darrin Wesley with prejudice and without fees or costs to any party.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

         I, Joseph E. Addiego III, hereby attest that concurrences in the filing of this document have been obtained from each of the signatories.

         All pending matters are TERMINATED. The clerk shall close this file.


Summaries of

Becker v. Skype Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Jun 20, 2014
12-cv-06477 EJD (N.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2014)
Case details for

Becker v. Skype Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CANTON BECKER, JOSEPHINE ASPLUND, and DARRIN WESLEY, individually and on…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Jun 20, 2014

Citations

12-cv-06477 EJD (N.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2014)