From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Becker v. Sidweber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1933
237 App. Div. 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

January, 1933.


Order of the County Court of Rockland county reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and defendant's default opened and the judgment entered thereon vacated, upon payment to the plaintiff of ten dollars motion costs. In our opinion, the defendant's default was excusable because of his serious illness, his absence from Rockland county and his confinement in a sanatorium at the time the cause was reached for trial. Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Davis, J., concurs for reversal in the exercise of discretion, but on condition that the defendant stipulate that the cause of action shall not abate, it being doubtful that the plaintiff will ever be able to bring the cause to trial during the lifetime of the defendant, against the objection of the party undertaking the defense; and that the evident purpose is one of delay to the end that plaintiff will be deprived of his remedy.


Summaries of

Becker v. Sidweber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1933
237 App. Div. 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

Becker v. Sidweber

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH F. BECKER, Respondent, v. HARRY SIDWEBER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1933

Citations

237 App. Div. 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Citing Cases

Benadon v. Antonio

Moreover, it appears that plaintiff was well aware of defendant's difficulties, including actual…