Opinion
CASE NO. 2:06-cv-830.
December 22, 2006
OPINION AND ORDER
On November 20, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus be transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit as a successive petition. Doc. No. 3. Petitioner has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Doc. No. 4. On December 6, 2006, petitioner also filed a "Final demand for mandatory three judge panel, immediate unconditional release, and treble RICO damage judgment with discovery for unknown new or future RICO sanctions." Doc. No. 6. The latter motion is not decipherable.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation objected to by petitioner. For the reasons discussed in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, petitioner's objections are OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit as a successive petition. Petitioner's December 6, 2006, Doc. No. 6, is DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.