From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BECKER v. DAHL

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 23, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0519 KJM EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 23, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0519 KJM EFB P.

May 23, 2011


ORDER


On March 15, 2011, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed March 9, 2011, directing the Clerk of the Court to strike plaintiff's January 19, 2011 amended complaint. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's order shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the file, the court finds that the magistrate judge's ruling was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed March 9, 2011, is affirmed.

DATED: May 20, 2011.


Summaries of

BECKER v. DAHL

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 23, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0519 KJM EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 23, 2011)
Case details for

BECKER v. DAHL

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH BECKER, Plaintiff, v. DAHL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 23, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0519 KJM EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 23, 2011)