From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BECKER v. DAHL

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 20, 2010
No. CIV S-10-0519 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0519 FCD EFB P.

July 20, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 12, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 12, 2010, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's March 3, 2010 motion for a preliminary injunction is denied.


Summaries of

BECKER v. DAHL

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 20, 2010
No. CIV S-10-0519 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2010)
Case details for

BECKER v. DAHL

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH BECKER, Plaintiff, v. DAHL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 20, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0519 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 20, 2010)