Opinion
May 4, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kitson, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in concluding that the conduct of the defendant Scott Ostro and his attorney was frivolous within the meaning of 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 and in imposing sanctions against them (see, Matter of Mancini v. Mancini, 245 A.D.2d 519; Somma v. Wehrle, 245 A.D.2d 284).
Miller, J.P., Joy, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.