' [Cit.]" Beck v. State, 263 Ga. App. 256, 257 (1) (a) ( 587 SE2d 316) (2003). Certainly "[t]he making of objections falls within the realm of trial tactics and strategy and [thus] usually provides no basis for reversal of a conviction.
Ellington and Mikell, JJ., concur.Beck v. State, 263 Ga. App. 256, 258 (1) (b) ( 587 SE2d 316) (2003). Id. at 259 (1) (d).
Thus, C.S. has not met her burden of proving that she was prejudiced by trial counsel's alleged deficiency. See Beck v. State, 263 Ga. App. 256, 258 ( 587 SE2d 316) (2003). In addition, trial counsel visited the crime scene, where he took steps to evaluate whether the State's witnesses had an adequate vantage point from which to view the incident.
(Citation and punctuation omitted.) Beck v. State, 263 Ga. App. 256, 259 (2) ( 587 SE2d 316) (2003). See also Leaptrot, supra at 598-599 (3) (c).
There was no error in this regard. Robinson v. State, 269 Ga. App. 828, 829 ( 605 SE2d 422) (2004); Helton, supra at 432 (3); Beck v. State, 263 Ga. App. 256, 259 (2) ( 587 SE2d 316) (2003). 2.
Beck v. State.Beck v. State, 263 Ga. App. 256, 257 (1) ( 587 SE2d 316) (2003). There are two components to a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel.
The jury found him guilty of all counts except one count of aggravated child molestation and one count of child molestation, as to which the trial court directed a verdict of acquittal." Beck v. State, 263 Ga. App. 256, 256-257 (2003). For the reasons stated in the thorough and well reasoned Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, neither the Petitioner's trial counsel nor his appellate counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel.